Looking for a Raygun alternative?
Simple error tracking without the complexity
Why developers choose Checkend over Raygun
- Deploy on your infrastructure
- No complex pricing tiers
- Focused on error tracking essentials
- Complete data ownership
- Simple Docker deployment
Feature comparison
| Feature | Checkend | Raygun |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted option | ||
| No subscription fees | ||
| Error grouping | ||
| Error deduplication | ||
| APM | ||
| User tracking | Coming soon | |
| Ruby SDK | ||
| Data ownership | ||
| Simple pricing (No usage-based or per-event pricing) |
The self-hosted advantage
With Checkend, your error data never leaves your infrastructure. Deploy on your own servers and maintain complete control over your application monitoring data. No subscription fees, no per-event pricing, no vendor lock-in.
100%
Data ownership
$0
Monthly fees
Unlimited
Error events
Migrating from Raygun
- Checkend offers straightforward exception capture
- Replace Raygun error sending with Checkend.capture
- Configure your self-hosted endpoint in the SDK